Add your banner to this banner rotation. Check out the ad specials! Click here!
Search:

Sports Blog
MLM Blog
Best Ezine

I me my yours ours theirs video web iQ intelligense smart clever MLM network marketing affiliate marketing internet marketing Business Opportunity Business Opportunity work at home work from home wahm wahd home-based business stocks money hyip forex

Subscribe to The Network Marketing Success Ezine

First name

Last name

Country
 

E-mail address
 

Subscribe
Unsubscribe  

 
 

We guarantee your privacy! We will never share your email address, period. Simple opt out instructions included with every communication. If you don't like what we're sharing with you, you can banish us... forever!
   

Increase YOUR web site's income today

Should Killing Liberals Be a Hate Crime?

Gokart Video Site
Gokart Video Site Gokart Video Site
Gokart Video Site

The tragic killing of two people and the wounding of eight others at the Tennessee Valley Unitarian Universalist Church in Knoxville allegedly because of the church's "liberal views" brought up a discussion of hate crime laws on Fox News this week that I analyze in this video. The four clips in my video come from the July 28, 2008, broadcasts of the Fox News programs "The Live Desk" (showing anchor Jane Skinner and criminal defense attorney Drew Findling) and "Studio B With Shepard Smith" (showing criminal defense attorneys Julia Morrow and Arthur Aidala). These programs are not available online. I also include in my video screen shots of Tennessee Code § 40-35-114 that you can find in full online at http://michie.lexisnexis.com/t...

Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am
Author: LiberalViewer

Length: 04:10
Rating: 4.69
Views: 61748

Tags: aclu  Adkisson  Church  crime  D.  fox  gay  Hate  jim  Knoxville  liberal  news  shooting  Tennessee  Unitarian  Universalist  Valley  

Video Url:


Embed Code:

Video Comments

Tabbi8407 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I think all crimes should be considered "hate" crimes. whether they hate the person or hate themselves (destuctive path)...you don't murder someone out of love....
TexWhatever (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
again define crime v misdemeanor. i've already done this for you. why? yes i did. i refuted them as they are sloppy and vague. a google term search can bring up thousands or millions of links. not specific enough pal. wikki can be written by anyone who can say anything they like so therefore not reliable. EVERYBODY knows that.
Beskargam (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"criminals" refers to anyone that has ever committed a crime, so yes, you did need to be more specific. The middle section of each of our comments. This section. You didn't refute them. In order to refute wikipedia, you would have needed to cite the source that it used for its information as unreliable. Actually, telling you to google "petty theft" is neither sloppy nor vague.
TexWhatever (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
i didn't need to because you didn't bring up 'reformed' criminals so again you are being pedantic. don't understand your 'middle' comment. clarify. no. i didn't ignore them. i refuted them. they consisted of google and wikipedia. both unreliable. i said produce verifiable evidence which you've failed to do. your directions were sloppy and vague
Beskargam (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
You did not say ACTIVE criminals initially. You said criminals hate everyone. take a look at what's been in the middle of these comments for a while. In America, petty theft is not a major crime. If it was, it would always be charged as a felony. You asked me for verifiable proof that misdemeanors and felonies are both crimes in America. I gave you the exact directions to find this proof, and you ignored them.
TexWhatever (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
you have a lot to learn. deal with some ACTIVE criminals who buy into the look, the attitude etc etc before you tell me of your 'expertise'. like i said, i've been dealing with them all my life. bringing what up? theft is a major crime. if you choose not to see that it's up to you. being drunk in public is a misdemeanor, offensive language is a misdemeanor. please research something other than wikipedia. ignore what? i've addressed everything you've put. YOU like to argue too sport!
Beskargam (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Yes, it does, but not when it comes to the behavior of a group of very diverse people that are only grouped together based on the fact that they have all been convicted of violating the law. You're the one that kept bringing it up, it's not my fault you like to argue. Petty theft in America often gets charged as a misdemeanor. Does that make it not a crime? Of course not, because in America, a crime is an act that violates the law. So, your response to me giving you answers is to ignore them?
TexWhatever (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
no, generalising serves a purpose. and if you bothered to read my original post you would have noticed that i put in a disclaimer (try reading it again). generalising has its uses (i.e. tiger = death). wow! big fucking deal! you should win a prize at the anal retentive's society for that one. theft is a crime, not a misdemeanor. and googling everything is lazy research (the kind that republidorks are known for)
Beskargam (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Yes, I'm well aware that some criminals lie. The reason I called your statement foolish is that it generalizes, which is lazy thinking. Actually, you brought up contempt in response to my first comment here, when I said that you could commit a crime without hate. For the last one, all you would need to do is wikipedia search "crime in the united states". Or, you could just check what happens when you google "petty theft" and see that it can be charged as a misdemeanor, while it is a crime.
TexWhatever (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
ummm...you just said YOURSELF that you don't know any active criminals and you adopted a condescending tone about a statement i made. get over it! you really ARE gullible. reformed criminals will say whatever suits their purposes at the time. if you knew them you would know that they lie to themselves a lot of the time as well so are often incapable of giving you an honest answer. ummm...no YOU used the word contempt and i pointed it out. nope. show me verifiable proof of your last statement

Subscribe to
"The Network Marketing Success Ezine" 
 
The network marketing ezine for distributors, leaders and trainers working hard to build their business with articles, blog, tips and tricks from people who have been there done that.

Bonus: 8 Quality Audio Reports w/ Resell Rights

Amazing Advertising Tips

Blockbuster Cash Secrets

Breakthrough Sales Solutions

Clever Profit Generating Insights 

Covert Product Selling Principles

Customer Tested Buying Triggers

Explosive Influence Tactics

Extreme Persuasion Strategies

First name
Last name
Country
Primary E-mail address
Subscribe  
Unsubscribe  
 
 
   
We guarantee your privacy! We will never share your email address, period.
Simple opt out instructions included with every communication.
If you don't like what we're sharing with you, you can banish us... forever!


Add your banner to this banner rotation. Check out the ad specials! Click here!

The Network Marketing Success Ezine - Home | The Network Marketing Success Ezine - latest issue

I web sight Video Site
© 2008 Lovenfeldt Marketing Inc. All Rights Reserved.