|
Spaticle (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I'd posted a much longer version of this comment previously -- but complications arose with the whole registering thing, so I'm not sure if it got through. At any rate, I can't believe the level of comments about this video. A couple of points here:
A. Lisa Randall is a world renowned physicist and she deserves your respect.
B. She is a beautiful woman -- which has nothing whatsoever to do with science -- and anyone who says otherwise deserves to have his ass kicked.
mozart20dlubos (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Damn, lisa randall looks like a man, I've been looking at full pictures of her, and she's built like a man, everything from the wide shoulders to the thin waist. I guess it's true, the claim that a high level of testosterone is connected with better performance in spatial tasks and mathematics. She probably has a very high libido cos of her unusually high testosterone level.
leverageeverything (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The clearest description I ever heard about different dimensions was from the teaching company (TTC) lectures - I think it was from the 'joys of math'. It's a useful primer.
plato2014 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"demension" is a mathematical term that laypeople can not fully understand without math education
Remagoen (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
You didn't answer my question: Did you test them?
orsiorsi186 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Remagoen:I haven't thought about these things probably for ten years,but at one time I studied this
stuff quite extensively.
The ether theory you dismiss is that it is the ' medium' for the propagation of light. However,
Newton thought light was a particle so it needs no medium to propagate itself , does it?
Think about this stuff,If you're young your
brain is still fresh. Einstein did all his stuff in 1905,when he was in his twenties,
After that it was all downhill.
Remagoen (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Have you tested these hypotheses*?
Sorry, I mixed the words up.
Remagoen (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
You're welcome and thank you.
The luminous ether has nothing to do with Dark Matter (look at even the names!). They're two completely different things. I suggest even Wikipedia to show you the difference, as it is vast.
The ToR isn't a "no truth", because, as I said, it was observed. And since it didn't have anything to do with the ether, you can't claim that.
You seem to be speculating based on assumptions of Dark Matter. Have you tested these theories of yours?
orsiorsi186 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I must admit you have true spirit.Thanks for responding,most people on You tube give up after five minutes.
I know the string theory is different than the
theory of relativity.But, they come from the same 'no truth' basis.The observations of warped spaced could be a disturbance in the Dark matter.Or the ether which Newton spoke of.
Not space it self,which contains the dark matter.99.9 of the universe is filled with it.
I have a BS in Biology,but
"I'm a voice crying in the wilderness"
Remagoen (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
And you would know, if you actually studied physics instead of listening to that people who don't know about physics tell you, that the Theory of Relativity is separate from String Theory. I'll admit that ST is on shaky ground, but so was a lot of other things before they were proven, such as warped space, which HAS BEEN OBSERVED multiple times.
Out of curiosity, where are you getting these conclusions from? What books have you read? What websites have you visited? What classes did you take? |
