|
thenebbishroute (August 21, 2008 at 10:11 pm)
Power is an illusion. All Moronymous does is piss in the wind.
adkufvasoryas (August 6, 2008 at 4:01 pm)
i dont mean 2 sound stupidly mysterious when i say this stuff, but anon cannot be defined, and i certainly cannot distill how someone can be truly anonymous into a few sentences. what i can express to you is that there's a quality, a swagger, a way we go about things that make us anonymous. theres a certain quality in anonymous that can't be described. if you dont understand it at first, you never will. right now there is so much copypasta and fake shit that u cant even tell who is anonymous.
UnknownSquid (July 31, 2008 at 4:49 pm)
Absolutely true, however you are talking about the anon of /b/ and 4Chan. Dont make the mistake that we were the first anonymous. 2Channel had their own anon long before us.
We do as we please. Thats the true essence of the 4Chan anon I think. That means if some want to bring down scientology, fine. And if some couldnt care less, fine. We simply led the siege since we had the power to.
We cant be defined. But Ill be right there with you wearing an afro in the next habbo raid.
TempleOfSin (July 31, 2008 at 10:14 am)
I don't think I could have put it that well. Very well said and very logical.
TempleOfSin (July 31, 2008 at 10:11 am)
Would you like to distill how somebody can 'truly' be Anonymous into a few sentences? Are you making any kind of sense?
Teenagers like bodyXpolitic and TehBigToaster think they're 'truly' Anonymous. I hope you're speaking from a more solid foundation than they are.
ConcreteSky21 (July 31, 2008 at 9:18 am)
Couldnt put it more philosophical.
freddymagick (July 30, 2008 at 7:49 am)
we need to form more cell networks. one cell per Scientology org. force Scietology to spread themselves thin buy forcing them to try and investigate every cell group. with decentralised operations against Scientology we could couse a dent in their church by straining their smaller orgs and forcing their higher ups and the sea org to have to take control of the smaller orgs which may couse resentment and infighting within scientology.
adkufvasoryas (July 29, 2008 at 7:31 pm)
implying my individual identity? how so? no one speaks for anon, anon speaks for it self. In what way have I represented anon? my comments on Jewtube have only showed that i am acting NOT as anonymous, therefore i could not be representing anonymous. from your words i can guess that everything you've learned about anonymous is from ED.
thetrueraygun (July 28, 2008 at 9:52 pm)
Your arrogance and need to imply your individual identity makes you a newfag.
It has no body, no soul, only hunger for idiosyncratic anarchism. You do not speak for anon. I do not speak for anon.
TariqAlSuave (July 28, 2008 at 6:58 am)
The DDoSing was win. Everything since has primarily been fail.
If you want to be a fucking activist, pick a cause that matters. If you want to get lulz, pick a target and MO that is amusing.
IRL protests occupy a shitty middle ground; they accomplish little to no moral aim, and they are deficient in lulz.
Newfags need to lrn2 Parable of the Caudine Forks |