|
gibs0nguitaro (August 27, 2008 at 2:07 am)
except william buckley actually had a brain....a brilliant one too
LTBL88 (August 25, 2008 at 2:34 pm)
it's like bill o reilly in the 60s
david552 (August 22, 2008 at 6:34 pm)
I'll sock you and you'll stay plastered!
what devastating repartee
spacemarine17 (August 22, 2008 at 3:10 am)
Buckley interrupted Vidal.
squinkymel (August 21, 2008 at 2:25 am)
Yeah, I don't know how I'd feel if someone kept calling me a "crypto-nazi", mainly because it's just so darned silly
zenanarchist (August 21, 2008 at 12:40 am)
are you stupid? hitchens is a dumbass
BrekanArts (August 20, 2008 at 2:05 pm)
Buckley was a great conservative theorist; but Chomsky is totally correct in his assertions about Imperialism.
After all, calling each other names doesnt make either corret to their respective political points of view; it just makes them both childish name callers!
I stand with Voltaire on matters like this; I'll agree to disagree with both of these extremists, but defend til death their right to say it.
After all fighting for peace is like screwing for virginity.
tmgore64 (August 19, 2008 at 4:53 pm)
countless times? I counted once. How about you? Brilliant? Buckley's argument was that the people protesting the Vietnam war were asking (or at least deserved) to be beaten. If you saw all 12 debates you would know that Buckley had himself been beaten soundly by Vidal -- Buckley's desperate outburst was frustration -- so much for free speech.
caseykc666 (August 19, 2008 at 12:57 am)
Wow, somethings never change.
joelatdi7 (August 17, 2008 at 7:49 am)
and time and time again, the conservative has proven to be the most confused and belligerent. i feel like william may have misunderstood what gore implied. |
