|
winterstellar (July 20, 2008 at 3:09 pm)
Why is the rating disabled? This is an obvious 5-star video! :)
senseimak (July 11, 2008 at 4:39 am)
I think what you guys are missing is the value of individuals buying into one school of thought so avidly. Each individual that believes 100% in something devotes all of their time to advancing that field. If we have an individual obsessively advancing each field we end up with multiple schools of thoughts/research being advanced at very high rates and those who are in the middle can benefit greatly from the use of each of these schools of thought.
wiscsuzski (July 8, 2008 at 2:09 pm)
I thought his flaw was in assuming people were pigeons.
Makavelian67 (June 16, 2008 at 1:04 am)
you sure won't love them after they crap on your porch/balcony dozens of times a day!
megan4197 (June 14, 2008 at 10:37 pm)
Pinker is a Sociobiologist. Sociobiology is inherently ad-hoc and therefore unscientific, in my opinion. If you want a valid biological theory, turn to Ethology.
megan4197 (June 14, 2008 at 10:35 pm)
Another way in which Skinner was misunderstood. You have no idea what you are talking about. It was Watson who took the "blank slate" stance.
Skinner acknowledged genetics and biological determinants. He also acknowledged internal processes - but he only explored the empirical basis of behavior - that which could be observed.
Also, Skinner was for the most part, atheoretical; his major contributions were method rather than theory.
jcas0167 (May 11, 2008 at 8:20 am)
Skinner's behaviourism was flawed. He assumed people were blank slates. Read Steven Pinker's book 'the Blank Slate' which debunks this idea.
pplzsaywtf (April 25, 2008 at 9:32 am)
very interesting
laurenisastar333 (March 16, 2008 at 8:17 pm)
these people are all illuminati, pre-Nazi WAKE UP!
xtinaboi83 (February 9, 2008 at 12:21 am)
pigeons are so smart :)love them. |
