|
KTF0 (May 5, 2008 at 4:57 am)
Mosley was a beast at lightweight. We was a good good welterweight, but an absolute monster at lightweight. His only flaw is that he didn't fight Stevie Johnston. Still though Mosley would've probably been the favorite.
wtw88 (April 22, 2008 at 2:44 am)
See Sawds305. I agree with him but not with you, Hatuey. Shane did a great job at 36 years of age against a real hard and talented fighter in Miguel Cotto. Don't laugh at Shane. You show yourself as unworthy when you haven't got the heart to respect the greats.
j0el0u (April 11, 2008 at 4:33 am)
Very well stated.
movieman7000 (March 26, 2008 at 11:30 pm)
can you post the full figh
ONEBRODIE (March 16, 2008 at 5:09 pm)
Sawds: Like I said.
Sawds305 (March 15, 2008 at 7:35 pm)
I don't know how you can say that. Sugar Shane was a destroyer at lightweight and had he stayed there he would definitely been one of the greats. He was chasing that DLH fight and moved up, the problem with Shane is he wanted to beat guys the same way he did at 135. Look at how PBF changed his style as he went up, he wasn't always so defensive but that is wat u have to do to hang with a guy so much bigger than you.
avalino79 (March 5, 2008 at 5:02 pm)
awwhhh man!!! that was a sack of potatoes. he woke up like, "why's my shoulder separated?"
ONEBRODIE (February 29, 2008 at 4:37 am)
Without the "cream," Mosley is like Splenda. Fake! Never would have made it over the hump that made him great.
youknowmystyle (February 16, 2008 at 11:30 am)
Lol.. Ragdoll
TermiteAssassin1 (January 5, 2008 at 9:09 am)
Not really. That fight could've gone either way. Mosley's pretty faded these days. |
