|
7ych0 (October 11, 2008 at 3:15 pm)
That's not a technological demonstration, that's plain propaganda.
brokensocialism (October 10, 2008 at 3:45 pm)
共产主义及社会主义是注定失败!现在全世界只有五个名字叫共产主义国家的国家.有多少个正在搞资本主义呢?大家心照明白!在共产国家的人民.个个做牛做马.共产党的幹部就大鱼大肉.当年毛泽东的肚子那麽大.中国人民个个都骨瘦如柴. 大家心里就明白了.西方的共产主义和社会主义是不适合中国的!中国共产党应该取消共党专政! 中国才有希望! 人权! 民主! 自由! 平等!
brokensocialism (October 10, 2008 at 3:44 pm)
奴隶制(共产主义)，奴隶主(共产党)拥有奴隶(人民)的制度。奴隶(人民)须为奴隶主(共产党)干活，无报酬，且无人身自由。法律确认奴隶为奴隶主的私有财产，共产主义跟奴隶制也一样，国家所有财产归共产党。人民跟本不可能享受自己生产所得的回报。奴隶主(共产党)对奴隶(人民)握有生杀予夺的权力，可随意奴役、杀害。奴隶(人民)没有独立的人格，没有任何自由和权利。
bigpotato8 (October 7, 2008 at 2:53 pm)
nice game..
innermostsanctum (September 30, 2008 at 8:00 am)
lol, i just have seen how about 18 different heavy armed units killed 1 man carrying panzerfaust :) after loosing one whole vehicle, and lots of resources, counting energy, ammunition and work hours of so many soldiers
excellent :D :D :D
FutureStudy (September 28, 2008 at 4:07 am)
I justify that statement for because the inventor of the term, Joseph Nye, implicitly also wrote so when he described soft power. Regarding Chinese soft power, it is contracting, as I live in Asia and can see. Its influence is waning and in some cases suspicions of China are rising among the population. Sometimes people over play soft power's importance. People have a short term memory. The negative impact of Iraq on American influence will soon be forgotten as people move on.
MpowerdAPE (September 27, 2008 at 10:05 pm)
how do you justify that statement with reality of chinese "soft power"?
china doesnt OWN us because of its investment in "hard (military) power". investments witch are negligable as concerns thier GDP, unlike ours.
simpleminded (bush#2-esk)carrot and stick approaches are the staple of defense industry lobbies. oh and simple minded red necks eat that shit up too.
FutureStudy (September 27, 2008 at 9:31 pm)
It doesn't matter what you call it, FCS, or simply, new technology, the US military will never stop trying to advance its technology, and nor should it. US soft power and US peaceful influence is only worth something because of the implicit backing of the hard (military) power.
MpowerdAPE (September 24, 2008 at 6:32 am)
interesting commercial
fcs is on the verge of cancelation btw.
THE ARMY AFTER NEXT by Thomas K. Adams. if you wanna know what happened.
p.s. ever wonder why you can count on one hand the number of drones flying over the entire middle east at any one time? if you can answer that you know why it failed.
Denis326 (September 19, 2008 at 8:03 pm)
No country has sucessfully created an EMP bomb large enough to wipe out such a large system. The only EMP bomb that can today is a nuclear weapon. |
