|
singerlad34 (October 14, 2008 at 4:19 am)
It's laughable that Pott's even made it into the comments below this video. He is nothing. I lack the vocabulary to eloquently describe just how unimportant, unskilled, and unmemorable Potts is as a performer when compared to Pavarotti.
simoruscio10 (October 13, 2008 at 11:32 pm)
this is the ORIGINAL, no paul poots..... paul poots> FAKE
Krimnosha (October 13, 2008 at 6:39 pm)
This is lame ... where are the dancing girls and the flashy niggers with spinning wheels and golden teeth... This is so lame ... I dont get dis kind ov music
leoalbertino (October 13, 2008 at 4:22 pm)
legends never really dies!
Kai2oo6 (October 13, 2008 at 3:09 pm)
yea potts didn't make it sound good anyway it was the ochestral piece itself, it's a really powerful song and Pavarotti had a really powerful voice especially when he gets to the "vincero" VINcerOOOOOOOOOO" he completely overlaps the music itself as where that Potts guy the music got too loud for him
mx50virus (October 13, 2008 at 3:06 pm)
cant do anyhting but agree with everybody... paul who?
this was amazing
ziomaic (October 13, 2008 at 11:03 am)
simply the best voice ever heard on the earth..
jajmjbylso (October 13, 2008 at 10:43 am)
yeah paul potts isn't near this level
but he is still a great singer, and an inspiration 4 many ppl, he also seems like a great guy so im very happy 4 him that he is doing well. He definately deserved 2 win britans got talent.
tylerdurden2621 (October 13, 2008 at 10:23 am)
I just saw some thing on paul potts and took a listen and thought he sounded really good, but then I heard this and he is pretty lame in comparison. I know nothing about opera, but this absolutely blows paul potts out of the water, not even close.
frnazeez2222 (October 13, 2008 at 8:49 am)
Andrew jonston |
