|
drunkBUTsober (August 26, 2008 at 11:53 am)
ok but its kinda slow
kakaboy (August 23, 2008 at 4:35 pm)
Adam is a Beatles fan like any of us, like any of us could sing the same song of other song of the beatles, with this interpretion adam shows so much respect for the beatles and this interpretation sounds good, The Beatles are legend.....
DelynSmilez (August 20, 2008 at 12:13 am)
this song make me cry in a good way.i love him.lol.
MrSifter8 (August 8, 2008 at 12:28 pm)
pyschera - what a pompous tit you are! heh heh. Hilarious. And you're completely wrong of course. As I imagine you are about most things in life.
aranguibelangulo (July 11, 2008 at 10:57 pm)
I'm Beatles number one fan of all, believe me, and I found this cover absolutely amazing, I coudn't stop crying! (and I'm a 50 years-old straight guy, if you wonder). This Adam Levine must love the Beatles as much as I do, and he's great by himself!!!
willashland (June 26, 2008 at 7:22 pm)
I can understand peoples' problem with it because the original sticks to the key tones more and doesn't hang on a lot of 6th's and 2nd's and stuff, and I think the original sounds better, as great as this version is.
richiecockburn (May 15, 2008 at 4:35 pm)
oh dear thats fucking terible
hesGOTgame (May 14, 2008 at 12:48 am)
fuckin brilliant
pyschera (May 4, 2008 at 8:07 pm)
OMG! Have none of you heard of alternative modification in vocalizing or minor chording instrumentally?! There's nothing at all wrong, off tune, out of pitch or dissi\onant about this arrangement. Both Adam and the band do a superb job with the alternative techniques. My best guess is anyone who thinks otherwise simply doesn't have sophisticated tastes. Denah
HaremHeart (April 8, 2008 at 10:13 pm)
Dissonant. I love Adam's voice, and he's very talented with his improve. But I don't like this interpretation. |
