|
ilsadeborah (June 26, 2008 at 10:49 pm)
All this mobile phone radiation next to your ear can NEVER be good for mankind. If she is a scientist or not is not the question. She is being backed up by a lot of them. Of course there are a lot of other causes of cancer, and people in wars are dying as well. Put in context is alright but I think we have enough people on the plantet to be occupied with each of these subject..We are just trying to make the best of life no?? At least that is where Change starts :)
YF19sama (May 11, 2008 at 11:53 pm)
And how many irakians will die after this war, cosidering uranium bullets/missiles are massively used on the ground radiating the environement (ground, air, vital ressources).
This is another subject. She talk about wirelless diseases around all the world for people trying to live in peace.
arjunus (April 4, 2008 at 4:28 pm)
I respect what you have wrote.
But for the proof if she hase right you must wait.
We think abouth 2 till 3 jears.
Then there is the evedence thats happening in the uman body with microwaves with sizes smaller then the components of the uman body.
arjunus (April 4, 2008 at 4:23 pm)
If a lot off people are getting sick of it you must look wjat is hapening at those people.
And not like now saying thats there is noting going on.
Look whats cosses the ilnes at those people.
Why can't the sleep.
It's all over the world the same health problems.
oneirondreamer (March 17, 2008 at 9:23 pm)
The problem with this type of discussion is that there is no context. It is clear that radiation of all types can be dangerous. The question should be given context, is EMF from cell phone radiation more likely to cause cancer than standing in the sun, or drinking coffee? I suspect that context is not given by people like this, because it would make most people see it a non-issue. Some things need to be put in context. How many people died in Iraq this year, that's important
wesman83 (March 12, 2008 at 7:33 pm)
cindy sage is not a scientist and she has no clue what shes talking about, shes just benefiting from the hysteria of an uninformed public. "precautionary principle" is NOT science
ynkl7abg (February 2, 2008 at 12:39 pm)
test
nrobnas (January 30, 2008 at 12:19 pm)
The Germans are still in denial about cell phone dangers eventhough there are articles in the newspapers about the dangers of cell phones. My son(13)is the only one out of 26 w/o a cell phone- he had cancer!!! No one wants to hear cell phones are bad!
TimLeitch99 (January 28, 2008 at 8:41 pm)
What a well-expressed summary, Cindy. Well done on all the valuable work you and other eminently-qualified scientists have done to identify and highlight risks of EMR. The scientific evidence is becoming clearer all the time. It is evident that the potential of risk is greater than many realise. Until authorities responsible for public health act to safeguard society better, people should take steps to protect themselves if they are to have any chance of avoiding adverse health consequences.
mobilecommandhealth (January 21, 2008 at 9:16 pm)
An excellent summary of the BioInitiative report - a truly independent and objective evaluation of the science at a time when most 'independent' reports are effectively written by the cell phone industry! |
