|
alexjones4president (September 6, 2008 at 9:02 pm)
Coming from someone who has "two talking cats" as one of your favorites, you`re the one who should be doing your research. MEOW.
ImperativeNation (September 6, 2008 at 8:59 pm)
Geese you CT's keep parroting everyone else in your alleged proof. The accusation that Silverstein meant blowing up the building when saying "pull it" has been debunked already. When will you guys give it up? by "it," he meant the firefighting efforts in the building. Further, why would he tell the fire chief this? Since when does the fire chief blow up buildings? Or was he in on it too?
I long for the day when a CTer actually does some research.
alexjones4president (September 6, 2008 at 8:07 pm)
WTC 7 was imploded purposely. Not because of fires and not because it took on too much damage. Silverstein admits it was "pulled". OH, but then NIST states recently that fires caused the collapse. So who`s lying?? WTC 3, 4, 5 and 6 took on HUGE amounts of damage since they were closest to the towers, yet they never collapsed. 9/11 was an inside job folks.
capelipl (September 6, 2008 at 5:39 pm)
19 arabs who hate our freedoms
good conspiracy to think ?
cia pentagon mossad falseflag massmurder
bad conspiracy to think?
gangrenebrain,youre a retard!
an idiot citizen who thinks every threat to existance will be explained to you by the laughing elites at the top of your economic food chain or their bought & paid for media
your a mindfucked peasant!
4:46,what part of a cop saying "move back the buildings about to blow up" are you having a problem understanding?lol,lol,lol
newmember2000y (September 6, 2008 at 11:09 am)
it doesn't really matter whether wtc7 was rigged with explosives or not. it doesn't matter if 9/11 was staged by the gov. or not. because in either case no one can deny that the reaction of the gov. was to make it into an excuse to achieve some of its future projects. and it's funny how they couldn't even wait for a good excuse to go into iraq, it was like the people became numb by fear that they left all choices, good and bad, to the gov. while they wasted time worrying about useless truths
gangrenous77 (September 6, 2008 at 4:33 am)
Here's an idea, let's get some french dude who knows all about explosions to watch a video and tell us what he thinks...without knowing any of the other factors involved.
How do a demolition crew make the top of the building buckle before it's about to collapse??? The building was structurally screwed. It had sustained a LOT of damage that you can't see. Look for some firefighter accounts. Do some research. Don't take this shit as gospel
Conspiracy theorists are retards
unclesamsnephew666 (September 6, 2008 at 4:22 am)
here's your truth movement, lying as usual:
watch?v=nHShDDHbTq4
watch and see how a favorite 911truthtard video, the one with the firemen saying "there's a bomb in the building" turns out to be at Stuyvestant High School, NOT at the WTC like the lying 911truthtard movement wants you to believe it is.
free fall speed - LIE
"fire can't melt steel" - LIE
"there's a bomb in the building" - LIE
3 strikes and you're out, truthtards.
ImperativeNation (September 5, 2008 at 7:13 pm)
Well, 32 seconds in and this video is already presenting false facts.
"The 9/11 Commission Report avoids mentioning WTC 7"
This video, like many, may others *cough zeitgeist *cough assumes (correctly) that most people haven't read the 9/11 commission report. Unfortunately WTC 7 is mentioned in the report, try pages 301, 310, and 319 for starters.
graypony4 (September 5, 2008 at 3:46 am)
Hey, look! Its a poop in the shape of a chocolate bar! Wow, It looks just like chocolate, so it must be chocolate, right?
Don't "swallow" this video before you "smell" it.
911insidejob9117 (September 4, 2008 at 2:16 pm)
wtc7 collapsed in 11.september at 5:20 pm. It looked like controlled demolition!
And it was!!!!
If it was controlled demolition than they knew about 9/11 before it took place.
It takes days to plan and prepare for controlled demolition. ( not 8 hours) |
