|
mamamia2121 (October 8, 2008 at 4:04 am)
cool!
Deanzsyclone (September 29, 2008 at 2:59 am)
See what happens when you point out absolute fact, people start giving you thumbs down, because it's not what they want to hear. You just stated fact and will get boos for it. God people are stupid.
Comparing a wall for a nuclear building designed to withstand a plane or missile crash to the pentagon... unbelievable.
rymen (September 24, 2008 at 9:18 pm)
how can 100 floors of reinforced high quality concrete collapse....sorry PULVURIZED in 10 sec.
please take a look here,
watch?v=PQlIipMokq4
and
watch?v=6HOTAUy_mrQ&feature=related
if you can explain me how it really happend, please share, Im studying in Civil Engineering and I need all kind of information, thx
PaharCuPai (September 21, 2008 at 10:08 pm)
if 911 was a real terrorist atack...the investigation would have been more acurate on science and facts ! crash a boing into steel...induce fire upon steel and measure the temp ...apply presure on steel and recreate tension of the towers...would those towers collapse at freefall speed without help?? how? the entire world know it was an inside job (illuminati plan) ..but we are all quiet in the media... nothing is oficial..every discusion is "underground" ..USA has set the start ..in 911.
hererj (September 18, 2008 at 6:51 pm)
limasol - what video showing the tail of a plane hitting the pentagon? please message me the link to the video.
Wile your at it, find a video to show a steel building free fall on itself due to fire.
Ricangal (September 17, 2008 at 2:26 pm)
Hear what 911 Commissioner, Tim Roemer had to say. See Youtube video "Pentagon hit by missile".
jeffmay1 (September 17, 2008 at 5:11 am)
Not only giving him a heads up, but teaching him a little about reality and how to actually disect the truth. Even watching a video like this he can be inaccurate. Thats how CT's work. They will even take an illusion as fact. lol
jeffmay1 (September 17, 2008 at 5:11 am)
Smaller plane, and not 10,000 gallons of jet fuel.
jeffmay1 (September 17, 2008 at 5:07 am)
The Pentagon was re-enforced concrete, so it was stronger than the average wall of course, but not as tough as the wall in this video, so somewhere in between. The plane was able to penetrate a little, but not the same as an average wall somewhere
jeffmay1 (September 17, 2008 at 5:05 am)
Yes well it wasn't the same type of wall designed to protect a nuclear power station.
People really need to remember that the Pentagon, as impressive as it is, is just an office bldg. PERIOD. There are no missled defense systems in place to protect it. People act like it has a defense system in place, it doesn't, IT'S JUST AN OFFICE BLDG, with security guards. No military with shoulder pack missles to shoot down planes etc etc etc. |
