|
samppu74 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
What the hell is this shit music? Your own band?!?
laux33 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
too slow
now, arms are instantly
mgsfan15 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The Pentagon was burning for a LONG time. Missiles aren't meant to burn the target, there meant to destroy with the force of the explosion and impact.
And sorienor, thanks for the video, this is just what I was looking for. It is clear that the Pentagon's damage isn't from a missile. unless it's a Land to Land missile the size of a limozine that hit it. Which is even more unlikely.
TeleCumber (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Actually if you google images "missile damage" you'll find photos of damage to concrete buildings that looks remarkably similar to the pentagon damage.
If a large airliner hit at over 500mph however, the whole section would have been destroyed.
sorienor (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
You mean the hole that is the exact diameter of a 757 fuselage? Explosives would have created a HUGE and/or irregular hole or simply obliterated the building entirely.
The rest is complete conjecture and bullshit.
TeleCumber (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Wasn't talking so much about the explosion.
Rather the object we're told is a 757 nose, but is too small and low, and is shaped like a missile - and the white smoke trail it leaves. Also the silvery flash on impact is characteristic of a missile. Then there's the round hole it made. Anyway..
sorienor (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
No. None of these look anywhere close to the pentagon explosion. Look again, this time without bias.
The fireball as the pentagon was huge, indicative of a fuel-air explosion. There is almost no fire at all in the detonations of this video.
TeleCumber (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Looks like what you see on the 9/11 pentagon security camera footage. Take a look.
export83 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
yay
CapitanFiro (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
spain are going to buy this missile =D |
